zeinab usefi; mohammad ali akhgar; Abbas Ahmadi Saadi
Volume 10, Issue 1 , December 2021, , Pages 159-179
Abstract
In this article, the issue of religious plurality and diversity in Javadi Amoli's views and his answer to the following main questions is examined. The purpose of this study is to use a descriptive-analytical method to typology of Javadi Amoli's view on the issue of religious diversity and to include ...
Read More
In this article, the issue of religious plurality and diversity in Javadi Amoli's views and his answer to the following main questions is examined. The purpose of this study is to use a descriptive-analytical method to typology of Javadi Amoli's view on the issue of religious diversity and to include his answers to the three main questions of the issue of religious diversity, namely the question of rightfulness, the question of salvation and the question of interaction of followers of religions. This issue should be determined. In order to achieve this goal, Javadi Amoli's view on the question of rightfulness based on the unity of religion and nature, critique of relativity in the subject and reality and the issue of righteousness are analyzed and it is shown that Javadi Amoli has a more exclusive position on the rightfulness of religions. Javadi Amoli, in response to the question of salvation, takes an inclusive approach by raising issues such as guidance and disability. In response to the way they interact with the followers of other religions, they also believe in peaceful coexistence based on criteria and coexistence, a coexistence that is practically based on an inclusive attitude towards religious plurality and plurality.
Mohsen Marvinam
Volume 9, Issue 1 , August 2020, , Pages 1-24
Abstract
Among the issues that have an effective role in the dialogue between Islam and Christianity and how the followers of these two religions can have, is to explain the place of the fate of the followers of the two religions, In this article, an analytical, comparative method seeks to explain the foundations ...
Read More
Among the issues that have an effective role in the dialogue between Islam and Christianity and how the followers of these two religions can have, is to explain the place of the fate of the followers of the two religions, In this article, an analytical, comparative method seeks to explain the foundations and The common religious beliefs of Islam and Christianity, which according to the religious texts and the specific causes and circumstances of the followers of both can be saved.Motahhari's professor believes non-Muslims who have not gained to the right religion of time (Islam), if this lack of knowledge and achievement is not due to their fault and shortcomings, or their prejudices, and are arbitrarily opposed to the right to surrender, according to Godliness And the truthfulness of their intentions and their moral and moral deeds can be called salvation, from which they have been interpreted as "innate Muslims." And in the Christian religion, Karl Rahner, of the contemporary Catholic Christian theologians, by proposing the theory of the "inclusiveness of salvation," and refreshing and redefining the concept of "eternal grace" within human beings, the non-Christians who respond to this divine grace and their inner voice and conscience Given and believing in God and doing good moral deeds, they are called "unknown Christians" and can be saved.
Javad Ayar; Majid Mollayousefi
Volume 1, Issue 2 , October 2013, , Pages 1-25
Abstract
In history of Christianity, from the latter half of second century, a version of Christianity pervaded that is known today as Pauline interpretation of Christianity. Paul, whose original name was Sh'aul, was born in the town of Tarsus, Cilicia (in modern Turkey), of Jewish parents belonging to the tribe ...
Read More
In history of Christianity, from the latter half of second century, a version of Christianity pervaded that is known today as Pauline interpretation of Christianity. Paul, whose original name was Sh'aul, was born in the town of Tarsus, Cilicia (in modern Turkey), of Jewish parents belonging to the tribe of Benjamin. He persecuted the first Christians until an unproven revelation converted him to Christianity. According to Paul's views, a Christian is one who believes in the incarnation of God in the human form ,His sacrifice for the forgiveness of human sins ,Resurrection and His return to heavens, and who confesses that human beings due to their original sin that is established and institutionalized in them by Adam, not by good deeds but only through God's saving grace will be saved, and at last a Christian is one who believes that church is the Christ's representative on earth and that the salvation is only obtained through its Obedience. Pauline interpretation, with its epistemic and non-epistemic backgrounds such as religious prejudices, Hellenism and Greek language and conflicts with Jewish–Christian people, is essentially based on divinity of Jesus and the church. This version of Christianity has several important consequences for Christianity that result from theopomorphism or divinity of Jesus that descents Divine Status and makes God as a factor out of system of being.
haleh abdullahi rad; Mohsen Jahed
Volume 2, Issue 1 , January 2013, , Pages 47-65
Abstract
After the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century, experimental science emerged as a powerful challenger against religions. It not only question edtheir ability to solve human beings’ problems but also sought to propose more clear explanations about the world. Therefore, the relationship ...
Read More
After the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century, experimental science emerged as a powerful challenger against religions. It not only question edtheir ability to solve human beings’ problems but also sought to propose more clear explanations about the world. Therefore, the relationship between science and religion became the central debate in the philosophy and gave birth to various views. This article is an attempt to study this issue from the viewpoint of Francisco J.Ayala; a contemporary renowned American-Spanish priest and genetics scholar. He believes that the Bible is only infallible concerning the salvation and well-being of human being and does not intend to explain natural events. Ayala accepts methodological naturalism and refutes metaphysical naturalism to the point thathe denies the interference of God and other metaphysical causes in the affairs of the world. He believes that the theories of evolution and natural selection are sufficient for explaining the emergence of biological species in the world. From Ayala’s point of view, such perception could solve the evil’s problem, because if so, evils will be related to evolution and natural selection and God will be absolved from evils. It seems that Ayala’s solution does not have the ability to resolve the evil’s problem. Ayala splits science and religion up in two separate domains while they complement each other.
